State v. Koonce
This text of 249 N.W.2d 467 (State v. Koonce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of charges of aggravated robbery, Minn.St. 609.245, and aggravated assault, Minn.St. 609.22, subd. 1, and was sentenced by the trial court to a maximum indeterminate term of 20 years in prison. On this appeal from judgment of conviction, defendant contends that (1) his war-rantless arrest was not based on probable cause and that a subsequent lineup at which he was identified was tainted by this illegality, and (2) there was, as a matter of law, insufficient evidence identifying him as the assailant. We have considered both contentions and conclude that there is no merit to either of them.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 N.W.2d 467, 311 Minn. 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-koonce-minn-1977.