State v. Koonce

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Koonce

249 N.W.2d 467, 311 Minn. 556

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided January 7, 1977·No. No. 46256·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of charges of aggravated robbery, Minn.St. 609.245, and aggravated assault, Minn.St. 609.22, subd. 1, and was sentenced by the trial court to a maximum indeterminate term of 20 years in prison. On this appeal from judgment of conviction, defendant contends that (1) his war-rantless arrest was not based on probable cause and that a subsequent lineup at which he was identified was tainted by this illegality, and (2) there was, as a matter of law, insufficient evidence identifying him as the assailant. We have considered both contentions and conclude that there is no merit to either of them.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of charges of aggravated robbery, Minn.St. 609.245, and aggravated assault, Minn.St. 609.22, subd. 1, and was sentenced by the trial court to a maximum indeterminate term of 20 years in prison. On this appeal from judgment of conviction, defendant contends that (1) his war-rantless arrest was not based on probable cause and that a subsequent lineup at which he was identified was tainted by this illegality, and (2) there was, as a matter of law, insufficient evidence identifying him as the assailant. We have considered both contentions and conclude that there is no merit to either of them.

Affirmed.

State v. Koonce, 249 N.W.2d 467, 311 Minn. 556 (Mich. 1977).

Pincite

249 N.W.2d 467 (State v. Koonce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.