State v. Kong

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Kong. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 Haw. 94
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided June 13, 2013·No. SCWC-11-0000393·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-11-0000393

13-JUN-2013

02:55 PM

SCWC-11-0000393

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

STANLEY S.L. KONG, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000393; CR. NO. 09-1-0683(2))

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, and McKenna, JJ., and Circuit Judge Ayabe, in place of Pollack, J., recused, with Acoba, J., dissenting separately)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Stanley S.L. Kong’s application for writ of certiorari filed on April 29, 2013, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 13, 2013.

Samuel G. MacRoberts for petitioner /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Bert I. Ayabe

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Kong, (haw 2013).

State v. Kong (State v. Kong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.