State v. Koetting

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Koetting

867 S.W.2d 596, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1696, 1993 WL 439366

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 2, 1993·No. No. 62641·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction, by a jury, of second degree burglary, § 569.170, RSMo.1986, and stealing over $150.00, § 570.030, RSMo.1986. He was sentenced by the court as a prior and persistent offender to concurrent prison terms of five years. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished [597]*597with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction, by a jury, of second degree burglary, § 569.170, RSMo.1986, and stealing over $150.00, § 570.030, RSMo.1986. He was sentenced by the court as a prior and persistent offender to concurrent prison terms of five years. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished [597]*597with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Koetting, 867 S.W.2d 596, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1696, 1993 WL 439366 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

867 S.W.2d 596 (State v. Koetting) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.