State v. Koellermeier

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Koellermeier

704 P.2d 1169, 75 Or. App. 126, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3831

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 28, 1985·No. 47487; CA A34831·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. His only assignment is that the court erred in denying his petition for diversion pursuant to ORS 484.445.

The court denied the petition because defendant had a previous conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 484.450(4) (a). Defendant contends that that conviction was unconstitutional in that he was not represented by counsel and that it therefore cannot be utilized to deny diversion. The state concedes that defendant is correct. City of Pendleton v. Standerfer, 297 Or 725, 688 P2d 68 (1984).

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration of petition for diversion agreement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. His only assignment is that the court erred in denying his petition for diversion pursuant to ORS 484.445.

The court denied the petition because defendant had a previous conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 484.450(4) (a). Defendant contends that that conviction was unconstitutional in that he was not represented by counsel and that it therefore cannot be utilized to deny diversion. The state concedes that defendant is correct. City of Pendleton v. Standerfer, 297 Or 725, 688 P2d 68 (1984).

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration of petition for diversion agreement.

State v. Koellermeier, 704 P.2d 1169, 75 Or. App. 126, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3831 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

704 P.2d 1169 (State v. Koellermeier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related