State v. Koellermeier
This text of 704 P.2d 1169 (State v. Koellermeier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. His only assignment is that the court erred in denying his petition for diversion pursuant to ORS 484.445.
The court denied the petition because defendant had a previous conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 484.450(4) (a). Defendant contends that that conviction was unconstitutional in that he was not represented by counsel and that it therefore cannot be utilized to deny diversion. The state concedes that defendant is correct. City of Pendleton v. Standerfer, 297 Or 725, 688 P2d 68 (1984).
Reversed and remanded for reconsideration of petition for diversion agreement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
704 P.2d 1169, 75 Or. App. 126, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-koellermeier-orctapp-1985.