State v. Knox

2012 Ohio 1622, 986 N.E.2d 32, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1417, 2013 WL 1767762, 2013 Ohio LEXIS 1096
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 24, 2013·No. 2012-1896·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 98027, 2012-Ohio-3821. Reported at 134 Ohio St.3d 1469, 2013-Ohio-553, 983 N.E.2d 368. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell and Kennedy, JJ., dissent and would grant the motion as to Proposition of Law No. I.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Knox, 2012 Ohio 1622, 986 N.E.2d 32, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1417, 2013 WL 1767762, 2013 Ohio LEXIS 1096 (Ohio 2013).

2012 Ohio 1622 (State v. Knox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Knox
2012 Ohio 3821 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2012)