State v. Knowles
132 A. 924, 102 N.J.L. 726, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 242
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Knowles, 132 A. 924, 102 N.J.L. 726, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 242 (N.J. 1926).
132 A. 924 (State v. Knowles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.