State v. Knowles

517 A.2d 1075, 1986 Me. LEXIS 933
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedNovember 25, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 517 A.2d 1075 (State v. Knowles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Knowles, 517 A.2d 1075, 1986 Me. LEXIS 933 (Me. 1986).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Following a nonjury trial by the Superior Court, Somerset County, Linwood Knowles appeals his convictions for operating a motor vehicle after being declared an habitual offender and operating under the influence, 29 M.R.S.A. §§ 2298, 1312-B (Supp.1985), challenging the sufficiency of the evidence.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, the Superior Court rationally could have found beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the offenses charged and the nonexistence of the competing harms defense. State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me.1985); State v. Raubeson, 488 A.2d 1379, 1380 (Me.1985); 17-A M.R.S.A. § 103 (1983).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Romano
809 A.2d 158 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2002)
Roach v. State
749 A.2d 787 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2000)
Sims v. State
573 A.2d 1317 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
517 A.2d 1075, 1986 Me. LEXIS 933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-knowles-me-1986.