State v. Kniss

471 P.2d 866, 2 Or. App. 615, 1970 Ore. App. LEXIS 695
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJune 25, 1970
StatusPublished

This text of 471 P.2d 866 (State v. Kniss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Kniss, 471 P.2d 866, 2 Or. App. 615, 1970 Ore. App. LEXIS 695 (Or. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The defendant, having been found guilty of a felony by a jury, appeals.

His sole contention on appeal is that under the Constitution of the United States the defendant was [616]*616entitled tó have the jury instructed that to find him guilty the jurors must unanimously agree as to his guilt. This issue has been decided contra to the defendant’s contention in State v. Gann, 254 Or 549, 463 P2d 570 (1969).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Gann
463 P.2d 570 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
471 P.2d 866, 2 Or. App. 615, 1970 Ore. App. LEXIS 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kniss-orctapp-1970.