State v. Knipp

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Knipp

231 S.W.3d 275, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 951, 2007 WL 1814388

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 26, 2007·No. No. ED 88399·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darin Knipp (“Defendant”) appeals his judgment of conviction in the Circuit Court of Audrain County for failure to maintain financial responsibility under Section 303.025 RSMo. In his appeal, Defendant contends that the trial court erred when it denied his motions to suppress evidence and certain statements at trial.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darin Knipp (“Defendant”) appeals his judgment of conviction in the Circuit Court of Audrain County for failure to maintain financial responsibility under Section 303.025 RSMo. In his appeal, Defendant contends that the trial court erred when it denied his motions to suppress evidence and certain statements at trial.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Knipp, 231 S.W.3d 275, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 951, 2007 WL 1814388 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

231 S.W.3d 275 (State v. Knipp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.