State v. Knight

380 A.2d 61, 135 Vt. 453, 1977 Vt. LEXIS 653
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedOctober 14, 1977
Docket275-77
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 380 A.2d 61 (State v. Knight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Knight, 380 A.2d 61, 135 Vt. 453, 1977 Vt. LEXIS 653 (Vt. 1977).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The burden of establishing facts which support revocation of bail is upon the State with a right in the defendant to contest the evidence introduced.

The condition of release imposed by the trial court, i.e., that respondent not commit any offense for which probable cause may be found by the court, as interpreted by the trial court to permit revocation of bail upon an ex parte determination, without opportunity to be heard and to contest, is a denial of due process. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314 (1950); Aiken v. Malloy, 132 Vt. 200, 209, 315 A.2d 488 (1974).

The order of the trial court revoking bail is vacated, and respondent is released upon the conditions of relief previously imposed, except the condition (No. 6) above referred to. To be certified down forthwith.

Billings, J. did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marshall v. Casey
324 S.E.2d 346 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1984)
Brown v. Chase
462 F. Supp. 938 (D. Vermont, 1978)
State v. Brown
396 A.2d 134 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
380 A.2d 61, 135 Vt. 453, 1977 Vt. LEXIS 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-knight-vt-1977.