State v. Knight

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Knight

845 P.2d 936, 118 Or. App. 152, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 151

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 10, 1993

Docket91-06-34247; CA A73490

StatusPublished

This text of 845 P.2d 936 (State v. Knight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Knight, 845 P.2d 936, 118 Or. App. 152, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 151 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions for aggravated theft in the first degree, ORS 164.057, and conspiracy to commit aggravated theft in the first degree. ORS 161.450 (2)(b). He contends that the court erred by entering separate convictions. The state concedes that the court erred. ORS 161.485(3).

Conviction for conspiracy to commit aggravated theft in the first degree vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions for aggravated theft in the first degree, ORS 164.057, and conspiracy to commit aggravated theft in the first degree. ORS 161.450 (2)(b). He contends that the court erred by entering separate convictions. The state concedes that the court erred. ORS 161.485(3).

Conviction for conspiracy to commit aggravated theft in the first degree vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

845 P.2d 936, 118 Or. App. 152, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-knight-orctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack