State v. Kmetz

483 So. 2d 812, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 464, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6438
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 19, 1986
DocketNo. 85-1494
StatusPublished

This text of 483 So. 2d 812 (State v. Kmetz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Kmetz, 483 So. 2d 812, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 464, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6438 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

None of the reasons stated by the trial judge constitute clear and convincing reasons for the court’s departure from the sentencing guidelines. Accordingly, the sentence imposed by the trial court is reversed and we remand this case for resen-tencing within the sentencing guidelines.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and DELL, J., concur. LETTS, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
483 So. 2d 812, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 464, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kmetz-fladistctapp-1986.