State v. Klugh

121 S.E. 262, 127 S.C. 429, 1924 S.C. LEXIS 135
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 1, 1924
Docket11408
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 121 S.E. 262 (State v. Klugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Klugh, 121 S.E. 262, 127 S.C. 429, 1924 S.C. LEXIS 135 (S.C. 1924).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

The defendant was convicted in the County Court of Greenwood County, in February, 1923, under an indictment charging him with violation of the State Prohibition Law (Volume 2, Code 1922, c. 20). Upon appeal to the Court of General Sessions, the judgment was affirmed. He now appeals to this Court upon the sole ground, as his counsel state in their printed argument, that the act under which the County Court was established is unconstitutional in providing for a jury of six instead of twelve men.

In view of the provisions of Article 5, § 22, of the Constitution, “the jury in cases civil or criminal in all municipal *430 Courts, and Courts inferior to Circuit Courts shall consist of six,” there is no ground for the contention. ■ (It will be noted that in the reprint of the Constitution in the Code of 1922, Vol. 1, p. 557, the two words italicized above were inadvertently omitted.)

The judgment of this Court is that the judgment of the Circuit Court affirming the judgment of the County Court be affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Watts, Kraser and Marion concur. Mr, Chief Justice Gary did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cowart
162 S.E.2d 535 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 S.E. 262, 127 S.C. 429, 1924 S.C. LEXIS 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-klugh-sc-1924.