State v. Klinkel

South Dakota Supreme Court

State v. Klinkel

263 N.W. 159, 64 S.D. 2, 1935 S.D. LEXIS 79

CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 18, 1935

DocketFile No. 7835.

StatusPublished

This text of 263 N.W. 159 (State v. Klinkel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Klinkel, 263 N.W. 159, 64 S.D. 2, 1935 S.D. LEXIS 79 (S.D. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant was convicted of an assault and battery made upon one John Seubert, and has appealed.

Appellant does not question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction. After a careful examination of the record we are convinced that no error prejudicial to the rights of this appellant has been called to the attention of this court.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

All the Judges concur. *Page 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant was convicted of an assault and battery made upon one John Seubert, and has appealed.

Appellant does not question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction. After a careful examination of the record we are convinced that no error prejudicial to the rights of this appellant has been called to the attention of this court.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

All the Judges concur. *Page 3

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 N.W. 159, 64 S.D. 2, 1935 S.D. LEXIS 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-klinkel-sd-1935.