State v. KLEPACH

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. KLEPACH

202 S.W.3d 33, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1374, 2006 WL 2671007

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 19, 2006·No. ED 87001·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Yevgeniy E. Klepach (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction by jury of one count of stealing more than $500.00. Defendant claims the trial court improperly admitted testimony that he handed his wallet to a loss prevention officer.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Yevgeniy E. Klepach (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction by jury of one count of stealing more than $500.00. Defendant claims the trial court improperly admitted testimony that he handed his wallet to a loss prevention officer.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. KLEPACH, 202 S.W.3d 33, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1374, 2006 WL 2671007 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

202 S.W.3d 33 (State v. KLEPACH) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related