State v. Klein, Unpublished Decision (3-27-1998)

Ohio Court of Appeals

State v. Klein, Unpublished Decision (3-27-1998)

Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided March 27, 1998·No. No. 95-P-0053.·Unpublished

Opinion

Judgment affirmed. See Opinion and Judgment Entry. [FORD] (CHRISTLEY) (NADER)

TRAFFIC/R.C. 4511.21(A) ASSURED CLEAR DISTANCE:

A driver is required to operate his or her vehicle so that he or she can stop the vehicle under the prevailing conditions, pursuant to R.C. 4511.21(A). The existence of snow or ice on a roadway, or the difficulties of driving through a snow storm, do not constitute a legal excuse for a violation of a statute which contains a specific requirement. The operator of a motor vehicle blinded by lights, fog, mist, or any other atmospheric condition may not be excused for any negligent act or failure to use ordinary care.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed. See Opinion and Judgment Entry. [FORD] (CHRISTLEY) (NADER)

TRAFFIC/R.C. 4511.21(A) ASSURED CLEAR DISTANCE:

A driver is required to operate his or her vehicle so that he or she can stop the vehicle under the prevailing conditions, pursuant to R.C. 4511.21(A). The existence of snow or ice on a roadway, or the difficulties of driving through a snow storm, do not constitute a legal excuse for a violation of a statute which contains a specific requirement. The operator of a motor vehicle blinded by lights, fog, mist, or any other atmospheric condition may not be excused for any negligent act or failure to use ordinary care.

State v. Klein, Unpublished Decision (3-27-1998), (Ohio Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

State v. Klein, Unpublished Decision (3-27-1998) (State v. Klein, Unpublished Decision (3-27-1998)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.