State v. KLEIHAUER

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. KLEIHAUER

266 S.W.3d 271, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1157, 2008 WL 4003663

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 2, 2008·No. WD 68708·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Kleihauer appeals his conviction for robbery in the first-degree, armed criminal action, burglary in the first degree, tampering in the first degree, and assault in the first degree. He claims that the trial court abused its discretion in permitting the State to elicit certain testimony from a witness, which was only disclosed to Kleihauer the evening prior to the morning that the witness testified. The State only learned that it would introduce the testimony the evening before trial, and Kleihauer did not ask for a continuance to investigate the testimony. We affirm the conviction.

Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Kleihauer appeals his conviction for robbery in the first-degree, armed criminal action, burglary in the first degree, tampering in the first degree, and assault in the first degree. He claims that the trial court abused its discretion in permitting the State to elicit certain testimony from a witness, which was only disclosed to Kleihauer the evening prior to the morning that the witness testified. The State only learned that it would introduce the testimony the evening before trial, and Kleihauer did not ask for a continuance to investigate the testimony. We affirm the conviction.

Rule 30.25(b).

State v. KLEIHAUER, 266 S.W.3d 271, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1157, 2008 WL 4003663 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

266 S.W.3d 271 (State v. KLEIHAUER) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.