Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Kittle

State v. Kittle

797 N.E.2d 1283, 100 Ohio St. 3d 247
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 12, 2003
DocketNos. 2003-1292 and 2003-1293
StatusPublished

This text of 797 N.E.2d 1283 (State v. Kittle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Kittle, 797 N.E.2d 1283, 100 Ohio St. 3d 247 (Ohio 2003).

Opinions

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed on Proposition of Law No. 3 only.

{¶ 2} The certification of conflict is accepted.

{¶ 3} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with State v. Comer, 99 Ohio St.3d 463, 2003-Ohio-4165, 793 N.E.2d 473.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Comer
793 N.E.2d 473 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
797 N.E.2d 1283, 100 Ohio St. 3d 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kittle-ohio-2003.