State v. Kish
135 A. 920, 103 N.J.L. 505, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 223
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should' be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Minturn, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Kish, 135 A. 920, 103 N.J.L. 505, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 223 (N.J. 1927).
135 A. 920 (State v. Kish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.