State v. Kirkpatrick

365 S.E.2d 640, 89 N.C. App. 353, 1988 N.C. App. LEXIS 277
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 15, 1988
Docket8715SC864
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 365 S.E.2d 640 (State v. Kirkpatrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Kirkpatrick, 365 S.E.2d 640, 89 N.C. App. 353, 1988 N.C. App. LEXIS 277 (N.C. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

WELLS, Judge.

Under his sole assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred in increasing defendant’s sentence on resen-tencing from three years to fifteen years, relying on N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1335 (1983), which is as follows:

Resentencing after appellate review. Where a conviction or sentence imposed in superior court has been set aside on direct review or collateral attack, the court may not impose a new sentence for the same offense, or for a different offense based on the same conduct, which is more severe than the prior sentence ....

We disagree.

While G.S. § 15A-1335 has been interpreted to prohibit the trial court from imposing a more severe sentence because of reweighing factors in aggravation or because of finding new factors in aggravation, see State v. Williams, 74 N.C. App. 728, 329 S.E. *355 2d 709 (1985), where the trial court is required by statute to impose a particular sentence (on resentencing) G.S. § 15A-1335 does not apply to prevent the imposition of a more severe sentence. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-7.6 (1986) provides, in pertinent part, as follows:

Sentencing of habitual felons. When an habitual felon . . . shall commit any felony under the laws of the State of North Carolina, he must, upon conviction ... be sentenced as a Class C felon ....

See also State v. Aldridge, 67 N.C. App. 655, 314 S.E. 2d 139 (1984). Pursuant to the provisions of G.S. § 15A-1340.4(f)(l) (1983), the presumptive sentence for a Class C felon is fifteen years.

For the reasons stated, we hold that the trial court properly resentenced defendant to a term of fifteen years, and that the judgment of the trial court must be and is

Affirmed.

Judges Eagles and Greene concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Thomas
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2026
State v. Powell
750 S.E.2d 899 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
State v. Cook
738 S.E.2d 773 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2013)
State v. Holt
547 S.E.2d 148 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2001)
State v. Wilson
533 S.E.2d 865 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
365 S.E.2d 640, 89 N.C. App. 353, 1988 N.C. App. LEXIS 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kirkpatrick-ncctapp-1988.