State v. Kirkland
9 N.E.3d 1067, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1411
This text of 9 N.E.3d 1067 (State v. Kirkland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Kirkland, 9 N.E.3d 1067, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1411 (Ohio 2014).
Opinion
Hamilton C.P No. B0901629. This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of appellant’s motion to substitute counsel of Rachel Troutman, Tyson Fleming, and Elizabeth Arrick for Herbert E. Freeman and Bruce K. Hurst. It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 N.E.3d 1067, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kirkland-ohio-2014.