Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. Kirk

State v. Kirk

722 S.E.2d 209, 2012 WL 642436
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 27, 2012
Docket56P12
StatusPublished

This text of 722 S.E.2d 209 (State v. Kirk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Kirk, 722 S.E.2d 209, 2012 WL 642436 (N.C. 2012).

Opinion

722 S.E.2d 209 (2012)

STATE of North Carolina
v.
Kareem Abdullah KIRK.

No. 56P12.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 27, 2012.

Sherri Horner, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Kareem Abdullah Kirk, for Kirk, Kareem Abdullah.

Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 16th of February 2012 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County:

*210 "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of February 2012."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
722 S.E.2d 209, 2012 WL 642436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kirk-nc-2012.