State v. Kirk

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Kirk

280 S.W.3d 791, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 526, 2009 WL 1054483

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 21, 2009

DocketED 91323

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 280 S.W.3d 791 (State v. Kirk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Kirk, 280 S.W.3d 791, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 526, 2009 WL 1054483 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terreal Kirk appeals from the judgment of the trial court finding him guilty of burglary and arson. We have reviewed *792 the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s admission of evidence of phone messages left by Appellant for the victim of his crimes was not an abuse of discretion. State v. Hutchison, 957 S.W.2d 757, 763 (Mo.banc 1997). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terreal Kirk appeals from the judgment of the trial court finding him guilty of burglary and arson. We have reviewed *792 the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s admission of evidence of phone messages left by Appellant for the victim of his crimes was not an abuse of discretion. State v. Hutchison, 957 S.W.2d 757, 763 (Mo.banc 1997). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 S.W.3d 791, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 526, 2009 WL 1054483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kirk-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack