State v. Kirk

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Kirk

280 S.W.3d 791, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 526, 2009 WL 1054483

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 21, 2009·No. ED 91323·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terreal Kirk appeals from the judgment of the trial court finding him guilty of burglary and arson. We have reviewed *792 the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s admission of evidence of phone messages left by Appellant for the victim of his crimes was not an abuse of discretion. State v. Hutchison, 957 S.W.2d 757, 763 (Mo.banc 1997). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terreal Kirk appeals from the judgment of the trial court finding him guilty of burglary and arson. We have reviewed *792 the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s admission of evidence of phone messages left by Appellant for the victim of his crimes was not an abuse of discretion. State v. Hutchison, 957 S.W.2d 757, 763 (Mo.banc 1997). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

State v. Kirk, 280 S.W.3d 791, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 526, 2009 WL 1054483 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

280 S.W.3d 791 (State v. Kirk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related