State v. Kippen
This text of 2013 ND 230 (State v. Kippen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 12/19/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2013 ND 230
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Kevin Leonard Kippen, Defendant and Appellant
Nos. 20130239 & 20130263
Appeal from the District Court of Bottineau County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable Michael G. Sturdevant, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Anthony S. Benson, State’s Attorney, 616 Main Street, Bottineau, ND 58318-
1395, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Kelsey L. Gentzkow, 405 Bruce Avenue, Suite 100, Grand Forks, ND 58201, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Kippen
[¶1] Kevin Leonard Kippen appeals from criminal judgments following a jury verdict finding him guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol, under N.D.C.C. § 39-08-01, and driving while his license was suspended, under N.D.C.C. § 39-06-42. On appeal, Kippen argues there was insufficient evidence to sustain the verdict, because the State did not prove Kippen drove or operated the vehicle. We summarily affirm the district court’s criminal judgments under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 ND 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kippen-nd-2013.