State v. Kiper

Oregon Supreme Court

State v. Kiper

245 P. 1117, 117 Or. 620, 1926 Ore. LEXIS 196

DecidedApril 13, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 245 P. 1117 (State v. Kiper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Kiper, 245 P. 1117, 117 Or. 620, 1926 Ore. LEXIS 196 (Or. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

MoBRIDE, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of burglary in the Circuit Court of Multnomah County. The transcript of record on appeal was filed in this court on the sixteenth day of December, 1925, and the bill of exceptions on February 2, 1926. Since then nothing has been done by the appellant in the prosecution of his appeal. No brief has been filed, nor has any application been made for an extension of time within which to file a brief. Rule 8 of the Rules of the Supreme Court provides, in substance, that a failure to file such brief within the time required shall be considered a cause for affirmance. Under this rule, therefore, the judgment of the court below will be affirmed, and the cause remanded with directions to the court to enforce its judgment.

Motion to Aeeirm Judgment Allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MoBRIDE, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of burglary in the Circuit Court of Multnomah County. The transcript of record on appeal was filed in this court on the sixteenth day of December, 1925, and the bill of exceptions on February 2, 1926. Since then nothing has been done by the appellant in the prosecution of his appeal. No brief has been filed, nor has any application been made for an extension of time within which to file a brief. Rule 8 of the Rules of the Supreme Court provides, in substance, that a failure to file such brief within the time required shall be considered a cause for affirmance. Under this rule, therefore, the judgment of the court below will be affirmed, and the cause remanded with directions to the court to enforce its judgment.

Motion to Aeeirm Judgment Allowed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 P. 1117, 117 Or. 620, 1926 Ore. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kiper-or-1926.