State v. Kiper

245 P. 1117, 117 Or. 620, 1926 Ore. LEXIS 196
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided April 13, 1926·Published

Opinion

MoBRIDE, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of burglary in the Circuit Court of Multnomah County. The transcript of record on appeal was filed in this court on the sixteenth day of December, 1925, and the bill of exceptions on February 2, 1926. Since then nothing has been done by the appellant in the prosecution of his appeal. No brief has been filed, nor has any application been made for an extension of time within which to file a brief. Rule 8 of the Rules of the Supreme Court provides, in substance, that a failure to file such brief within the time required shall be considered a cause for affirmance. Under this rule, therefore, the judgment of the court below will be affirmed, and the cause remanded with directions to the court to enforce its judgment.

Motion to Aeeirm Judgment Allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Kiper, 245 P. 1117, 117 Or. 620, 1926 Ore. LEXIS 196 (Or. 1926).

245 P. 1117 (State v. Kiper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.