State v. Kinsader

Supreme Court of Kansas

State v. Kinsader

90 P. 1133, 77 Kan. 840, 1907 Kan. LEXIS 196

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJune 8, 1907

DocketNo. 15,096

StatusPublished

This text of 90 P. 1133 (State v. Kinsader) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Kinsader, 90 P. 1133, 77 Kan. 840, 1907 Kan. LEXIS 196 (kan 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The court has examined all the objections to the consideration of this case and finds none of them tenable.

The fact that the record' meets all the requirements of a proceeding in error and of a criminal appeal does not vitiate it.

The petition demurred to states a cause of action and is otherwise unobjectionable. The demurrer should have been overruled, the injunction should not have been dissolved, and the contempt proceeding should not have been quashed.

The case is reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The court has examined all the objections to the consideration of this case and finds none of them tenable.

The fact that the record' meets all the requirements of a proceeding in error and of a criminal appeal does not vitiate it.

The petition demurred to states a cause of action and is otherwise unobjectionable. The demurrer should have been overruled, the injunction should not have been dissolved, and the contempt proceeding should not have been quashed.

The case is reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 P. 1133, 77 Kan. 840, 1907 Kan. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kinsader-kan-1907.