State v. King

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedJanuary 13, 2005
Docket2005-UP-030
StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. King (State v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. King, (S.C. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Derron Jermaine King, Appellant.


Appeal From York County
 John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-030
Submitted January 1, 2005 – Filed January 13, 2005


APPEAL DISMISSED


Acting Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda P. Haile, of Columbia, for Appellant. 

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Thomas E. Pope, of York, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Derron Jermaine King entered guilty pleas under North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970), to two counts of armed robbery and one count each of second-degree burglary, criminal conspiracy, and possession of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime.  King appeals.  Counsel for King attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel.  King filed a separate pro se response. 

After a review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss King’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, STILWELL, and SHORT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
North Carolina v. Alford
400 U.S. 25 (Supreme Court, 1970)
State v. Williams
406 S.E.2d 357 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. King, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-king-scctapp-2005.