State v. King

916 N.E.2d 1072, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1491
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 18, 2009
Docket2009-1759
StatusPublished

This text of 916 N.E.2d 1072 (State v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. King, 916 N.E.2d 1072, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1491 (Ohio 2009).

Opinion

Muskingum App. No. 09-CA-22, 2009-Ohio-3854. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal and motion to certify a conflict. Motion for leave to file delayed appeal granted.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, and Cupp, JJ., dissent. Motion to certify a conflict denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
916 N.E.2d 1072, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-king-ohio-2009.