State v. King

822 S.E.2d 702
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 5, 2018
DocketNo. 69A94-3
StatusPublished

This text of 822 S.E.2d 702 (State v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. King, 822 S.E.2d 702 (N.C. 2018).

Opinion

Upon consideration the "Petition for Writ of Mandamus" is allowed for the limited purpose of reissuing the attached order from this Court, and directing the Superior Court, Durham County, to reconsider defendant's "Motion for Appropriate Relief in light of this Court's opinion in State v. McHone, 348 N.C. 254, 499 S.E.2d 761 (1998)" and to enter an appropriate order. See McHone, 348 N.C. at 258-60, 499 S.E.2d at 763-64 (holding that the defendant was entitled to an evidentiary hearing prior to a ruling on his Motion for Appropriate Relief where some of the asserted grounds for relief raised unresolved questions of fact).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. McHone
499 S.E.2d 761 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
822 S.E.2d 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-king-nc-2018.