State v. King
650 A.2d 174, 231 Conn. 937, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 397
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 35 Conn. App. 781 (AC 12363), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Under the circumstances of this case, was the Appellate Court correct in upholding the admissibility of the identification of the defendant at trial?
“2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court properly denied the defendant’s motion to sever the cases?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. King, 650 A.2d 174, 231 Conn. 937, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 397 (Colo. 1994).
650 A.2d 174 (State v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. King
665 A.2d 897 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1995)
State v. Pettway
664 A.2d 1125 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1995)