State v. Kinard
This text of State v. Kinard (State v. Kinard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
The State of South Carolina, Petitioner,
v.
Tony Latrell Kinard, Respondent.
Appellate Case No. 2019-001604
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal from Newberry County Donald B. Hocker, Circuit Court Judge
Opinion No. 27955 Heard March 11, 2020 – Filed March 18, 2020
CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch Jr., both of Columbia; and Solicitor David Matthew Stumbo, of Greenwood, all for Petitioner.
Richard James Dolce, of Richard J. Dolce, Attorney at Law, and Michael Vincent Laubshire, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in State v. Kinard, 427 S.C. 367, 831 S.E.2d 138 (Ct. App. 2019). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Kinard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kinard-sc-2020.