State v. Kimbrough

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Kimbrough

529 S.W.3d 930

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 10, 2017

DocketNo. ED 105251

StatusPublished

This text of 529 S.W.3d 930 (State v. Kimbrough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Kimbrough, 529 S.W.3d 930 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The State of Missouri appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County granting the motion of the defendant, Carlos Kimbrough, to suppress certain evidence, namely 74 pages of the defendant’s medical records obtained from Barnes-Jewish Hospital via a grand-jury subpoena duces tecum. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The State of Missouri appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County granting the motion of the defendant, Carlos Kimbrough, to suppress certain evidence, namely 74 pages of the defendant’s medical records obtained from Barnes-Jewish Hospital via a grand-jury subpoena duces tecum. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

529 S.W.3d 930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kimbrough-moctapp-2017.