State v. Kim

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Kim. Read the opinion of the Court — 140 Haw. 421
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided June 23, 2016·No. SCWC-14-0000833·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-14-0000833

23-JUN-2016

11:24 AM

SCWC-14-0000833

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

STATE OF HAWAI'I,

Respondent/Respondent-Appellee,

vs.

KEVIN PAUL KIM,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-14-0000833; CR. NO. 12-1-0363)

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-

referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate Court

of Appeals at the time the application for writ of certiorari was

filed, see Hawai'i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp. 2013); see also Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (2012),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/Defendant­ Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed

June 20, 2016 is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the

application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2014). (“The

application shall be filed within thirty days after the filing of

the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or

dismissal order, unless the time for filing the application is

extended in accordance with this rule.”).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, June 23, 2016.

Tae W. Kim /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Kim, (haw 2016).

State v. Kim (State v. Kim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.