State v. Kilroy

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Kilroy

543 A.2d 366, 1988 Me. LEXIS 180

DecidedJune 30, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 543 A.2d 366 (State v. Kilroy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Kilroy, 543 A.2d 366, 1988 Me. LEXIS 180 (Me. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

John F. Kilroy appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court, York County, entered on the jury verdict finding him guilty of violating 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B (Supp.1987). Because he has failed to show that he was in fact prejudiced by the claimed discovery violation by the State, we hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying his motion to dismiss the action on that ground. M.R.Crim.P. 16(d); State v. Reeves, 499 A.2d 130, 133 (Me.1985).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

John F. Kilroy appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court, York County, entered on the jury verdict finding him guilty of violating 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B (Supp.1987). Because he has failed to show that he was in fact prejudiced by the claimed discovery violation by the State, we hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying his motion to dismiss the action on that ground. M.R.Crim.P. 16(d); State v. Reeves, 499 A.2d 130, 133 (Me.1985).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

543 A.2d 366, 1988 Me. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kilroy-me-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack