State v. Killmon
This text of 398 P.2d 743 (State v. Killmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals from a conviction of the crime of armed robbery. Testimony of a detective as to oral admissions of participation in the alleged crime made to him by defendant requires that we remand the case for further proceedings.
The case was tried before the decision in Jackson v. Denno, 1964, 378 US 368, 84 SC 1774, 12 L Ed2d 908, and of our decision in State v. Brewton, 1964, 238 Or 590, 395 P2d 874. Consequently, neither court nor counsel were aware of the requirement that the court make an independent finding that the admissions were voluntary prior to admitting the testimony of the detective in which he related the admissions. We are, therefore, obliged to return the case for further proceedings according to the Brewton formtilá.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
398 P.2d 743, 239 Or. 560, 1965 Ore. LEXIS 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-killmon-or-1965.