State v. Kilgore
This text of 98 S.E.2d 346 (State v. Kilgore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant claims entrapment as her defense. There is no evidence of entrapment. S. v. Burnette, 242 N.C. 164, 87 S.E. 2d 191. No defense can, on this record, be predicated thereon. Hence, if error exists in the charge with respect to defendant’s claim of entrapment, the asserted error is not prejudicial.
The charge with respect to the failure of the defendant to testify substantially conforms to the statute. S. v. Horne, 209 N.C. 725, 184 S.E. 470.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
98 S.E.2d 346, 246 N.C. 455, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kilgore-nc-1957.