State v. Kilgore

98 S.E.2d 346, 246 N.C. 455, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 432
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 7, 1957
Docket723
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 98 S.E.2d 346 (State v. Kilgore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Kilgore, 98 S.E.2d 346, 246 N.C. 455, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 432 (N.C. 1957).

Opinion

PeR CuRiam.

Defendant claims entrapment as her defense. There is no evidence of entrapment. S. v. Burnette, 242 N.C. 164, 87 S.E. 2d 191. No defense can, on this record, be predicated thereon. Hence, if error exists in the charge with respect to defendant’s claim of entrapment, the asserted error is not prejudicial.

The charge with respect to the failure of the defendant to testify substantially conforms to the statute. S. v. Horne, 209 N.C. 725, 184 S.E. 470.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Stanley
215 S.E.2d 589 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1975)
State v. McLawhorn
191 S.E.2d 410 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)
State v. Swaney
178 S.E.2d 399 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)
State v. Caldwell
105 S.E.2d 189 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 S.E.2d 346, 246 N.C. 455, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kilgore-nc-1957.