State v. Kilgore
98 S.E.2d 346, 246 N.C. 455, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 432
Opinion
Defendant claims entrapment as her defense. There is no evidence of entrapment. S. v. Burnette, 242 N.C. 164, 87 S.E. 2d 191. No defense can, on this record, be predicated thereon. Hence, if error exists in the charge with respect to defendant’s claim of entrapment, the asserted error is not prejudicial.
The charge with respect to the failure of the defendant to testify substantially conforms to the statute. S. v. Horne, 209 N.C. 725, 184 S.E. 470.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Kilgore, 98 S.E.2d 346, 246 N.C. 455, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 432 (N.C. 1957).
98 S.E.2d 346 (State v. Kilgore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Stanley
215 S.E.2d 589 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1975)
State v. McLawhorn
191 S.E.2d 410 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)
State v. Swaney
178 S.E.2d 399 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)
State v. Caldwell
105 S.E.2d 189 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)