State v. Kiger
This text of 4 Ind. 621 (State v. Kiger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Indictment for gaming. On motion of Kiger, the indictment was quashed in the Court below. There, is no brief for the defendant, and the state furnishes no authority. We are thus left to imagine what considerations induced the action of the Court below.
We are unable to discover any defect in the indictment. The introductory part is not according to the forms.
The Common Pleas act could not affect this case, for the offence was committed before that went into operation. And the revised statutes of 1852 could not be in the mind of the Court, for they did not take effect till the 6th of May, 1853. Jones v. Cavins, ante, p. 305. Even had they been in force, there is a saving clause as to all [622]*622misdemeanors committed under the old law. R. S. 1852, vol. 1., p. 431, s. 3.
We think the Court erred in quashing the indictment.
The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
The indictment was as follows: State of Indiana, Delaware county, ss. In the Delaware Circuit Court, September Term, 1851. The Grand Jurors for the State of Indiana, upon their oath present, &c.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Ind. 621, 1853 Ind. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kiger-ind-1853.