State v. Kiersey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Kiersey

135 P.3d 392, 205 Or. App. 671, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 612

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided May 10, 2006·No. 0506-66271; A129385·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is presently a danger to herself or unable to take care of her own basic needs because of her mental disorder. The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is presently a danger to herself or unable to take care of her own basic needs because of her mental disorder. The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

State v. Kiersey, 135 P.3d 392, 205 Or. App. 671, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 612 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

135 P.3d 392 (State v. Kiersey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.