State v. KIDERLEN

220 S.W.3d 887, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 678, 2007 WL 1246230
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 1, 2007·No. ED 87994·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Kiderlen (hereinafter, “Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment after a jury convicted him of one count of damage to jail property, Section 221.353 RSMo (2000). Appellant was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment to be served consecutively to any other prison term he was serving. Appellant raises one point on appeal, alleging there is insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction in that the State failed to prove Appellant knowingly damaged jail property.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript on appeal and find there was sufficient evidence to sustain Appellant’s conviction. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed Pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. KIDERLEN, 220 S.W.3d 887, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 678, 2007 WL 1246230 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

220 S.W.3d 887 (State v. KIDERLEN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nicks v. Nicks
220 S.W.3d 887 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)