State v. Kibby

7 Mo. 317
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided April 15, 1842·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Opinion of the Court, delivered by

Scott, Judge.

An indictment was found against Kibby and others, containing two counts, one charging them with acting as grocers, without license, and the other with keeping a dram-shop, without license. On the trial, the circuit court compelled the circuit attorney to elect on which count he would proceed. This was objected to, and is the error assigned. The joinder of several offences in the same indictment in different counts, is no cause of demurrer, or arrest of l’udg- ° ment. • But in such cases, when the crimes alleged are felonies the court will compel the prosecutor to elect on which one he will proceed. This, however, is never done where the indictment is for misdemeanors. Storrs v. State, 3 vol. Mo. Rep.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Kibby, 7 Mo. 317 (Mo. 1842).

7 Mo. 317 (State v. Kibby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

University City v. Redwine
376 S.W.2d 609 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1964)
State v. Lief
154 S.W. 1133 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1913)
State v. Boyer
70 Mo. App. 156 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1897)
Hall v. State
24 S.W. 407 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1893)
Sanders v. State
14 S.E. 570 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1892)
State v. Heinze
45 Mo. App. 403 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1891)