State v. Kibble
This text of 2018 ND 208 (State v. Kibble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[¶ 1] James Kibble appeals from a criminal judgment following a jury verdict of aggravated assault arising out of Kibble's striking another person in the hand with the dull side of a meat cleaver knife. Kibble argues the State did not present evidence sufficient to support an inference by the jury that Kibble had the requisite intent to cause serious bodily injury to the victim. We conclude the verdict is supported by substantial evidence, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jerod E. Tufte
Jon J. Jensen
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2018 ND 208, 916 N.W.2d 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kibble-nd-2018.