State v. KF
This text of 197 P.3d 627 (State v. KF) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of K.F., Alleged to be a Mentally III Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
K.F., Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Charles Kochlacs. Medford, filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Inge D. Wells, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that there is insufficient evidence that she was a danger to herself or others because of a mental disorder. The state concedes that the record lacks sufficient evidence to support the order of commitment. On de novo review, we agree and reverse.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
197 P.3d 627, 224 Or. App. 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kf-orctapp-2008.