State v. Kersey
This text of 524 So. 2d 1011 (State v. Kersey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We review Kersey v. State, 515 So.2d 261 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), based upon certified [1012]*1012conflict with Hall v. State, 511 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), and Hoefert v. State, 509 So.2d 1090 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
The issue presented is whether the habitual offender statute, section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1985), may be used to enhance the statutory maximum sentence. We held in Winters v. State, 522 So.2d 816 (Fla.1988), that the habitual offender statute remains viable for this purpose, so long as the sentence imposed is within the guidelines range. Because we resolved this issue contrary to the view of the Fifth District,
It is so ordered.
The Fifth District has since receded from that view. Inscho v. State, 521 So.2d 164, 13 F.L.W. 326 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
524 So. 2d 1011, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 295, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 526, 1988 WL 40926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kersey-fla-1988.