State v. Kerr

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Kerr

623 P.2d 676, 50 Or. App. 301, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2088

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 3, 1981

DocketNo. B 57-314, CA 17736

StatusPublished

This text of 623 P.2d 676 (State v. Kerr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Kerr, 623 P.2d 676, 50 Or. App. 301, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2088 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s petition for reconsideration is granted and our former opinion is withdrawn. On the merits of defendant’s appeal, we conclude that if defendant was in custody when the challenged statement was made it is nevertheless admissible because it was not the product of interrogation as defined in Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 US 291, 100 S Ct 1682, 64 L Ed 2d 297 (1980).

Reconsideration granted; former opinion withdrawn. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s petition for reconsideration is granted and our former opinion is withdrawn. On the merits of defendant’s appeal, we conclude that if defendant was in custody when the challenged statement was made it is nevertheless admissible because it was not the product of interrogation as defined in Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 US 291, 100 S Ct 1682, 64 L Ed 2d 297 (1980).

Reconsideration granted; former opinion withdrawn. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

623 P.2d 676, 50 Or. App. 301, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 2088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kerr-orctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack