State v. Kerns

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Kerns

81 S.W.3d 154, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 875, 2002 WL 753499

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 30, 2002

DocketNo. WD 59999

StatusPublished

This text of 81 S.W.3d 154 (State v. Kerns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Kerns, 81 S.W.3d 154, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 875, 2002 WL 753499 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Kerns appeals his conviction following a jury trial for possession of a controlled substance, section 195.202, RSMo 2000, and sentence of five years imprisonment. In his sole point on appeal, he claims that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the State to endorse a witness two days before trial and in permitting her to testify. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Kerns appeals his conviction following a jury trial for possession of a controlled substance, section 195.202, RSMo 2000, and sentence of five years imprisonment. In his sole point on appeal, he claims that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the State to endorse a witness two days before trial and in permitting her to testify. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 S.W.3d 154, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 875, 2002 WL 753499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kerns-moctapp-2002.