State v. Kent

439 S.W.3d 299, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 907, 2014 WL 4198081
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 26, 2014·No. No. ED 100248·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Leo Kent (“Defendant”) appeals from a judgment of a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of robbery in the first degree, in violation of Section 569.020, RSMo (2000); two counts of assault of a law enforcement officer in the first degree, in violation of Section 565.081; three corresponding counts of armed criminal action (“ACA”), in violation of Section 571.015; and one count of unlawful use of a weapon for shooting from a motor vehicle, in violation of Section 571.030. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Kent, 439 S.W.3d 299, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 907, 2014 WL 4198081 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

439 S.W.3d 299 (State v. Kent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.