State v. Kenney

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Kenney

510 So. 2d 2, 1987 La. LEXIS 9744

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedAugust 7, 1987

DocketNo. 87-KK-1828

StatusPublished

This text of 510 So. 2d 2 (State v. Kenney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Kenney, 510 So. 2d 2, 1987 La. LEXIS 9744 (La. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Howard, D. Douglas Jr. — Other; Pedersen, Shawn Craddock — Other; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, and supervisory writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “H”, No. 320-296; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. KW-8380.

Granted. The ruling of the trial court is reversed, and the trial court is ordered to grant relator’s timely motion to withdraw. Because almost three weeks have elapsed since the filing of the motion, the granting of a continuance may be necessary for new counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Howard, D. Douglas Jr. — Other; Pedersen, Shawn Craddock — Other; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, and supervisory writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “H”, No. 320-296; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. KW-8380.

Granted. The ruling of the trial court is reversed, and the trial court is ordered to grant relator’s timely motion to withdraw. Because almost three weeks have elapsed since the filing of the motion, the granting of a continuance may be necessary for new counsel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

510 So. 2d 2, 1987 La. LEXIS 9744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kenney-la-1987.