State v. Kennedy
Opinion
h Shawn Fitzgerald Kennedy urges only one issue in this appeal. He attacks the constitutionality of La. R.S. 14:95.11 as being contrary to Const. Art. I, § 11, which was amended in 2012.2 Defendant’s challenge to the statute, however, is not properly before us.
The issue was not pled or litigated in the trial court, violating clear precedent. See State v. Hatton, 2007-2377 (La.7/1/08), 985 So.2d 709, and Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), 646 So.2d 859.3
In addition, the Louisiana Attorney General has never been served and has not yet participated in any way. See La. R.S. 13:4448; La. R.S. 49:257(0; La. C.C.P. art. 1880.
We must remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings.
DECREE
REMANDED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
140 So. 3d 1201 (State v. Kennedy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.