State v. Kennebrew

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Kennebrew

205 S.W.3d 300, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1666, 2006 WL 3199162

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 7, 2006·No. No. ED 86715·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, David K. Kennebrew (“Defendant”), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, entered after a jury trial, finding him guilty of unlawful use of a weapon, section 571.030, RSMo 2000. Defendant was sentenced as a prior offender to four years of imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, David K. Kennebrew (“Defendant”), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, entered after a jury trial, finding him guilty of unlawful use of a weapon, section 571.030, RSMo 2000. Defendant was sentenced as a prior offender to four years of imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

State v. Kennebrew, 205 S.W.3d 300, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1666, 2006 WL 3199162 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

205 S.W.3d 300 (State v. Kennebrew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.