State v. Kendrick
35 A.3d 1076, 303 Conn. 925
Opinion
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Said KENDRICK.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Marjorie Allen Dauster, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.
James B. Streeto, assistant public defender, in opposition.
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 132 Conn.App. 473, 31 A.3d 1189 (2011), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court improperly denied the defendant's motion to suppress based upon the exigent circumstances of a warrantless entry?"
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Kendrick, 35 A.3d 1076, 303 Conn. 925 (Colo. 2012).
35 A.3d 1076 (State v. Kendrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Kendrick
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2014