State v. Kendrick
This text of 35 A.3d 1076 (State v. Kendrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Said KENDRICK.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Marjorie Allen Dauster, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.
James B. Streeto, assistant public defender, in opposition.
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 132 Conn.App. 473, 31 A.3d 1189 (2011), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court improperly denied the defendant's motion to suppress based upon the exigent circumstances of a warrantless entry?"
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 A.3d 1076, 303 Conn. 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-kendrick-conn-2012.